Taiji not about generating power
Chessman organizes comments made by Tom into a single post. One of Tom's comments really got me thinking. The comment pertains to something he got via the HJS line:
According to him [HJS], Xingyi genuinely aims to generate internal power. So does Bagua. It is not the case with Taiji. In Taiji, there is no real power generated. Instead, it is a “perceived power” that Taiji is concerned with.Hmm... This really got me thinking about my own practice. I think I've been approaching things in the wrong perspective. I've been focusing on the end result, on the flash and the bang of fajin and therefore have focused on creating power. I've been taught that when doing fajing, I should shift my weight from kua to kua, instead of leg to leg. This is a minor distinction, but a very big one and I could definitely tell the difference in the amount of power and connectedness I felt, but is this the wrong way? If taiji is about using your opponents energy against them, how can I practice fajin with no real incoming force to redirect? I guess I could imagine the air coming at me or something, but I don't think that's right. I posed this question to a friend of mine that trains in CZH system via HJS and he basically was taught:
In the form, there are no strikesWhoa... Now, I believe this aligns with the notion of no power generation and is a way to link the left rear elbow attack with the right hand punch (or maybe better to be called "forward motion"..), but in any case, I definitely feel this is an interesting principle to explore. But then again, in most forms I have learned, before any punch is a block. In the chen form I train, the block is done in conjunction with a shifting weight into the rear leg and then the fajin is done with shifting in the reverse direction. Maybe that's the "incoming" energy I am working with? But to me, this still feels like energy I am generating myself...



13 Comments
I think you have some interesting points and you pose some very interesting questions in regards to the mechanics between the various IMAs. One thing I always wonder about is the scenario in which someone trains fully so much on the mind without getting the physical part right. As I recall, you have quite an extensive background in yang taiji, and most recently in the dong family set. I am pretty sure you got enough physical corrections and instructions that you could begin to focus on the mental aspects of the form. Would you agree?
I personally feel that I am still not fully there on the physical side. For someone who has only been doing taiji for about 7 yrs, I feel physically, I still have a long way to go in terms of body harmony and movement. I try to think about the mind training, but again, it's difficult, especially when I feel I don't have the structural stuff correct yet.
I guess I am afraid of becoming one of those rainbow taiji guys who just solely does the form in a very mental and introspective manner but when push comes to shove, they fall over. I've seen that and definitely do not want to become that.
I think for me, the hard part is when enough is enough. When is the focus on the physical too much? That's a hard question to answer, but it's good that you bring up these points. It's good to have someone with your viewpoints around balancing out my modalities on the physical.
Glad to see you've started blogging again. I especially like the entry:
"And that is why so many people seek the taiji fish
Most fail to catch it
Because you cannot catch what exists
Only in the delusional mind".
Good stuff! ;)
Wuji : I think you have some interesting points and you pose some very interesting questions in regards to the mechanics between the various IMAs. One thing I always wonder about is the scenario in which someone trains fully so much on the mind without getting the physical part right. As I recall, you have quite an extensive background in yang taiji, and most recently in the dong family set. I am pretty sure you got enough physical corrections and instructions that you could begin to focus on the mental aspects of the form. Would you agree?
Delusional Answer : I have a background in Shaolin and I was teaching Shaolin for about 10 years before I pulled the plug because it was getting in the way of my delusional mind seeking the delusional way. I learned CMC and Dong taiji along the way and thought I had it but I was delusional. Biomechanics are fine up to a certain stage. If you don't realize the limitations then your mind won't become delusional and want to seek this delusional path. You would also not realize why its necessary to give up the biomechanical aspect for the mindmechanical. Such is the power of delusion ;-)
Wuji : I personally feel that I am still not fully there on the physical side. For someone who has only been doing taiji for about 7 yrs, I feel physically, I still have a long way to go in terms of body harmony and movement. I try to think about the mind training, but again, it’s difficult, especially when I feel I don’t have the structural stuff correct yet.
Delusional Answer : Biomechanics are not difficult to understand nor do. Get a good teacher and within 5 years you can reach there. By the 10th year mark you can start to dissolve the hard edges. But the mind is still beyond reach as long as one cannot give up thinking of the body. That's my delusional viewpoint and experience. Its hard to believe it but getting the structural part correct can actually get in the way of finding the delusional mind. Think of it as an empty cup attempting to be filled with coffee and tea at the same time. The more coffee you have the less tea can go in and vice versa. Its not wrong to get the biomechanical part correct but it can be an impediment. When you get there one day you will see what I mean.
Wuji : I guess I am afraid of becoming one of those rainbow taiji guys who just solely does the form in a very mental and introspective manner but when push comes to shove, they fall over. I’ve seen that and definitely do not want to become that.
Delusional Answer : Mindmechanics in taiji is not the get-pushed-over-easily type of taiji. If your intention projection is strong, the moment you lay hands on somebody they will get this funny feeling of being enveloped by an all pervasive force field. I had shown this to Eman Rohe so unless he too was delusional I guess we were all kidding ourselves, ha, ha...........
Wuji : I think for me, the hard part is when enough is enough. When is the focus on the physical too much? That’s a hard question to answer, but it’s good that you bring up these points. It’s good to have someone with your viewpoints around balancing out my modalities on the physical.
Delusional Answer : It is never enough. If I had wanted to, there are more aspects to the biomechanics that I could have pursued. But fate played a funny trick on me and I got diverted to this path. Right now you are strong and there's no problem to use biomechanics. But consider a scenario - let's say you injure your back badly enough that each time you try to use biomechanics your back gets thrown off again. Would this be a case of enough is enough? Would this be a case to either deny the facts and continue on and in the end give up because the body cannot support the stress of using biomechanics any more or throw out the existing paradigm and work on another one? Who knows? Ah, I'm being delusional again. Anyway its time to get off work now and on with my social life. Bye.
Hi ZMS. I felt the same way when I was training in taiji but one of the instructors at the school also wanted me to train in his shaolin class. I felt doing so would "move me back" along my path b/c then I would be focusing on external muscular strength again. I think I understand your point.
[quote post="247"]Delusional Answer : Mindmechanics in taiji is not the get-pushed-over-easily type of taiji. If your intention projection is strong, the moment you lay hands on somebody they will get this funny feeling of being enveloped by an all pervasive force field. [/quote]
This is similar to the way Wai Lun Choi (WLC), AFAIK. His focus is on the intent, the spirit of the movement with very little focus on minute physical corrections of hip here, arm there type of stuff. Basically, he teaches in a manner of almost near instant feedback as you try the app to see if it work :)
[quote post="247"]Delusional Answer : ... But fate played a funny trick on me and I got diverted to this path. Right now you are strong and there’s no problem to use biomechanics. But consider a scenario - let’s say you injure your back badly enough that each time you try to use biomechanics your back gets thrown off again. Would this be a case of enough is enough? Would this be a case to either deny the facts and continue on and in the end give up because the body cannot support the stress of using biomechanics any more or throw out the existing paradigm and work on another one?[/quote]
Another interesting point. A friend of mine had hip problems and was due for hip replacement surgery soon. However, when a silk reeling seminar presented itself, he attended but due to his physical limitations and the requirements of stance work in silk reeling, he had to miss the following day. He could've done the exercises in a chair to get the energetic affects, but like most there, we wanted to get in low stances and train the legs to try and "feel" the twining.
Good points and thanks again for sparking the memories that confirms your views lingering in the back of my mind ;)
TC is a defensive martial art. We wait and see. I mean, we sense the energy and skillfully act on the energy as it surges from the enemy. If so, then 'percieved energy' is very important because without it, not action will be required. I guess this is similar to aikido since there is a strong drive toward energy redirection.
A question: why should I attack others when they do not attack me? when I percieve others aggresive energy in my direction, then I re-direct that energy and defeat them. Of course, this is very Yang style; though I sense the same in the little of Chen I know.
Bless be.
I don't believe you should attack someone if they do not attack you, however I think with chen, I've fallen victim to the flash (as I mentioned in my blog entry). If I am not mistaken, you recently did a seminar with CZL where he focused on "yang strikes". I wonder if anyone asked him the reason for practicing strike if not receiving energy? This is what I've been questioning.
Delusional Seeking
Delusional Defence
Why so? I did not because I am returning into TC and for me...anything in TC is so wonderfull that I was satisfied with the yang part...
I did learned a lot of yielding in the past and CZL did not talk at all about yielding...
I assumed that he thought that the audience wanted 'action.' more than softness... Who knows. Still it was fun doing the yang exercise...
It was not really push hands but the practice of the potential strikes in push hands. (well...not really...he did not showed any pushes.)
I'd like to contribute a couple of thoughts based on my own current understanding of these matters. Probably nothing you're not familiar with but here goes...
Practicing fajin: fajin should be a release of gathered energy. I would not describe this energy as coming directly from an opponent, but rather from my own energy-gathering movements prior to the issuing. Whether those movements were in following an opponent, or just following the form. Does this sound right? Anyway that's my firm impression - especially with Chen!
Speaking of Chen Zhonghua, you were johnny-on-the-spot to discover the "Kua interview" with CZH last summer. I just re-read this again and the part where he says "there is no redirection and no release". Only turning and neutralization, with expressions of taiji power all coming from that same base method that he describes in the interview! I find this fascinating.
>In the form, there are no strikesthe left rear elbow attack with the right hand punch
Leave a Comment